On October 10th, President Atsushi Hamana of our university gave a report on "Regarding Substantialization of Three Policies and Quality Assurance of Education" at the Central Council for Education Future Planning Subcommittee System/Educational Reform Working Group held at the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. I was.
Many universities have already established three policies due to legal obligations to formulate them, but they are not obliged to formulate them in the assessment policy, pointing out that each university has a goal to strive for. “Evaluation (Check)” is to recognize whether educational activities (Do) are being carried out based on the three policies (Plan) and whether learning outcomes have been achieved in line with the goals. I explained that it would not be a "PDCA" cycle and it would be difficult to materialize the three policies.
In the case study, the multi-dimensional and multi-layered evaluation criteria and evaluation method of Carleton University in Minnesota, USA, and in our university's "three-layered assessment using data", "university level" and "faculty/department level" By dividing the data into three layers at the "student individual level", we will explain the importance of multidimensionally combining and evaluating data such as grades, KUIS academic benchmark achievement, attainment confirmation test, graduation research results, etc. bottom.
The “Assessment Criteria and Methods” established by the university summarizes points of view regarding difficult-to-understand evaluation criteria, and publishes examples of evaluations based on each scale.
(For details, please refer to the following URL on the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology website.)
http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo4/043/siryo/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/10/20/1397540_7.pdf
